Saumer v. Cliffs Natural Resources, Inc.
Northern District of Ohio; Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals
Successfully defended Cliffs and certain current and former company executives in a putative ERISA “stock drop” class action. Plaintiffs—participants in the company’s 401(k) plan—alleged that their 401(k) accounts suffered significant losses due to a prolonged decline in the price of company stock. The trial court granted Cliffs’s motion to dismiss, and the Sixth Circuit, applying the pleading standards announced by the Supreme Court in Dudenhoeffer v. Fifth Third Bancorp, 573 U.S. 409 (2014), for the first time, affirmed without argument. Emmett was the main author of both the trial-court and Sixth-Circuit briefs.
Case Documents
(PDFs will open in a new tab)
Case Documents
(PDFs will open in a new tab)
Case Category: Appeals
Topics related to this case
Tags: Appeal, Business Litigation, Civil Litigation, Dispositive Motion, ERISA, Federal Appeal, Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, Federal Court, Fiduciary Duty, Motion to Dismiss, Securities Litigation, Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, stock-drop litigation